On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 6:35 PM Stephen J. Turnbull <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hirayama, Pat writes: > > > I finally looked at the host (rather than the logs of each > > container) and realized that the oom-killer was killing > > django-admin. [snip] > I have seen reports that uwsgi systems use a lot more memory than > gunicorn systems. I don't have hands on to confirm or analyze why, > though. I'm not sure using Whoosh (instead of Xapian, Elastic Search, > or SOLR) is a good idea -- I found it to be *extremely* slow on > initial indexing of a system with lots of archives migrated from > Mailman 2, and I wouldn't be surprised if that uses a lot of memory > (since then I have stuck to Xapian, so no confirmation or analysis). > I can attest to the fact that using gunicorn uses much less memory than uwsgi. On my server, I switched from uwsgi to gunicorn and the memory consumption dropped drastically - to almost nothing! Well, not nothing, but the constant 2GB that the mailman (uwsgi) process was using suddenly disappeared from my `btop` radar. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html] _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ Archived at: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/3JQODXVUWZ23R5D2F3P6G7WYIR56DSSK/ This message sent to [email protected]
