On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:06:40 -0800
Ed Lazor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We have different definitions of "unreasonable". I consider that
>> not requiring your members to such is not only unreasonable, but
>> foolhardy. <shrug> YMMV.
> Having different definitions is fine. I respect your opinion.
> I'm also glad I don't follow all of the proposed standards on the
> net and force people to adhere to them. That would translate to a
> large amount of changes, many for proposals that would never
> become standard.
The bit you are missing is that RFC 2369
(http://www.pasteur.fr/cgi-bin/mfs/01/23xx/2369) is on the standards
track, is widely adopted and fairly well supported by other tools
outside of Mailman. This is no new flash in the pan -- its over two
years old now.
--
J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------(*) http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
