>>>>> "BW" == Bill Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> But, Mailman could do a better job of conforming to RFC 2369. >> E.g. it could suppress List-Post: for read-only lists, BW> Or, as Chuq mentioned use the List-Post: NO syntax. That's what I meant to say. :) >> Whether that means adding for Mailman 2.1 a list-specific >> configuration option (-1) or a site-wide configuration variable >> (-0), I'm not sure. BW> Thank-you, Barry, for reconsidering this issue. Please cast BW> my vote for a per-list option for the reasons outline in my BW> message to JC. Noted. Thanks. -Barry ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? J C Lawrence
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Nigel Metheringham
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Barry A. Warsaw
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Mike Noyes
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Thomas Hillson
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Bill Warner
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? J C Lawrence
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Bill Warner
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Barry A. Warsaw
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Bob Puff @ NLE
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? "Jürgen A. Erhard"
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Dan Lowe
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Bill Warner
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Dan Mick
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Bill Warner
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Thomas Hillson
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Roger B.A. Klorese
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Dan Wilder