I still use tar. I had some problems with it 4 years ago, but it was easily fixable, and the next release corrected the problems. The main mis-belief about tar is that if one part goes bad (or is bad during the creation) then you can't get to the rest of the data. I'm sure this was true at one time, but not any more.
Just my 2¢ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Sherohman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Paul Tomblin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:23 PM Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] the best way to... > On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 12:06:06PM -0500, Paul Tomblin wrote: > > Quoting Dave Sherohman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > find . -xdev -print0 | cpio -pvdm0 /export/home2 > > > > Or my personal favourite > > > > tar cvfB - . | (cd /export/home2; tar xvBPf -) > > I've always stuck with cpio because I've heard that tar has problems > dealing with links and other special files. Is that a thing of the > past? > > -- > When we reduce our own liberties to stop terrorism, the terrorists > have already won. - reverius > > Innocence is no protection when governments go bad. - Tom Swiss > > ------------------------------------------------------ > Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
