John W Baxter wrote: > > At 6:07 -0600 1/1/2002, mel wrote: > >First thing > >I noticed was that all of the bounces were for one list, second thing that was > >weird is that there were 84 bounces on a list that only had 64 members. I do > >know where the bounces came from but they were not the list that the > >/home/mailman/log/bounce reported. Is this a bug? > > I think so. Or, it's a "surprising artifact of legacy code." > > It's been adjusted in Mailman 2.1, coming soon. > > --John > > -- > John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA > Well Just as long as when day 5 of the bounce run comes along the users in the correct list are tagged for admin attention.
------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users