John W Baxter wrote:
> 
> At 6:07 -0600 1/1/2002, mel wrote:
> >First thing
> >I noticed was that all of the bounces were for one list, second thing that was
> >weird is that there were 84 bounces on a list that only had 64 members. I do
> >know where the bounces came from but they were not the list that the
> >/home/mailman/log/bounce reported. Is this a bug?
> 
> I think so.  Or, it's a "surprising artifact of legacy code."
> 
> It's been adjusted in Mailman 2.1, coming soon.
> 
>   --John
> 
> --
> John Baxter   [EMAIL PROTECTED]      Port Ludlow, WA, USA
> 
Well Just as long as when day 5 of the bounce run comes along the users in the
correct list are tagged for admin attention.

------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users

Reply via email to