On 4/10/02 8:58 AM, "Jon Carnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a tough one. The best way to handle it, is simply lay down the law > and remove admins who break your rules. I've had a couple of fights over this one. It's convinced me to create a formal "terms and conditions" document outlining rights and responsibilities of a list admin. Unfortunately, dinking with "reply to" is one of those things that is forcing that issue, because I have a specific site-wide standard, and once in a while, I have an admin who won't accept that (more often, they don't remember, and it's unfair to yell at them because they don't memorize the rules I don't have written down anywhere). I had that discussion again this week, in fact. So I'm going to formalize out a document explaining what the standards are, and what the expectations for a list admin are. And violations like tweaking frozen values cause admins to get locked out the frist time, repeated violations will get an admin replaced or the list shut down. Right now, I'm working on the "trust you to cooperate" mode, and while 95% of them do just fine, that's just not good enough, and the fights that entail with that other 5% just aren't constructive. -- Chuq Von Rospach, Architech [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.chuqui.com/ Very funny, Scotty. Now beam my clothes down here, will you? ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
