"David Gibbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Try this patch; it won't avoid the interrupted system call, but it > > ought to handle the situation more gracefully (assuming it's a > > transient problem). > I'll give it a try ... but even after I applied the patch, I saw the hung > task again.
I've tweaked & tuned a bit and I think I've got it working well. Had to create another sendmail instance that didn't cannonify and was queueonly, but I haven't had a similar crash in a day or so. Thanks to all who directly, or indirectly, helped. david ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
