* Steve Huston ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Matthew Davis wrote: > > > * Jon Carnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Is there a reason you wouldn't want to simply include Htdig as part of > > > the "out of the box" install? > > My concern is the size of the package. > > Thats a good chunk, and adding htdig (tarball for 3.1.6 is 2 meg) would up > > the package size to roughly 7-8 meg. Considering I'm just a lowly dial-up > > 56k constant connection server (theres no plans of broadband where I live, > > way too far in the NC sticks), puts me as a minority I know. Just a > > concern. > > Yes, but look at just the size of Mailman, plus the "htdig" patches on > Sourceforge. That's not too big, and simply means you'd have to install htdig > separately. Or even change the patches around (if necessary, don't recall > now) so that they can be applied, but htdig isn't required for things to run. > Yes, you'd still have to download and install it if you wanted the > functionality, however it comes with RedHat at least so you could install it > from your distribution's media.
I agree. htdig and python are both on the redhat cd's. I fear that htdig will become part of the mailman package as pipermail is. -- Matthew Davis http://dogpound.vnet.net/ And now for something completely different... ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ This message was sent to: archive@jab.org Unsubscribe or change your options at http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
