Barry,

Thanks for the information. In the meantime, I have found ver 2.1 which
seems to have the option I am looking for.

Dear Mailman users,

I am having trouble receiving any post from mailman after I upgraded to ver
2.1 from 2.0x on a Redhat 8.0 server.

Please advise, I cannot find supporting documentation on the upgrade
process.

Regards,
Loay Oweis
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry A. Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Loay Oweis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: Reveal Post Sender


>
> >>>>> "LO" == Loay Oweis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>     LO> Dear Barry,
>
>     LO> I would like to know if Mailman can support the following:
>
>     |1. Reveal the sender of a message. Keep in From Field
>     | 2. Keep the list named as in Sender and Reply-to Fields.
>
>     LO> The purpose here would be to show the sender of a message in a
>     LO> list and also maintain that once a user replies to a post, he
>     LO> does so to the list without needing to reply-all which would
>     LO> cause the original sender to receive the message twice.
>
> Mailman doesn't touch the From field unless the list is anonymized
> (not the default).  Mailman 2.1 has a number of options to choose how
> the Reply-To field is composed.  Generally, Mailman considers the
> Sender field it's own to use (for bounce processing).
>
> For more information, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Cheers,
> -Barry
>


------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to