>>>>> "WY" == Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> When the system goes down uncleanly, you *want* manual intervention to >> ensure things are really ok. Otherwise, why bother even having that >> check in place? WY> In theory, perhaps. But in reality, what we want is for Mailman to WY> start. WY> If the system has been rebooted, it's not possible for any processes to WY> already be running (before the startup script runs), so it seems fairly WY> unlikely that any stale locks would be significant. And you know for certain that no other files were corrupted and horribly broken? I don't. ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe or change your options at http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
