Brad Knowles wrote:
>>At 11:30 AM +0200 2004-06-07, Martin wrote: >> >> >> > > >>>> is it possible to change "dynamicly" the "Reply-to"-Field to the mail address >>>> of the umbrella list when the mail is sent to the umbrella list and not >>>> directly to the sublist ? >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> I believe that this question has been asked on the mailing list >>before, but I don't recall if there was a solution, or what the >>solution was. I'd encourage you to search the archives. >> >> >> >> > > I have asked this question already but got no answer >> Thinking about this, one thing you might be able to do would be >>set a forced reply-to header for the umbrella list, and then do not >>set any reply-to header in any of the sublists. >> >> >> > > I this case I have no reply-header when I send directly to the sublist >> Alternatively, you could have each of the sub-lists set their >>reply-to header to point back to the umbrella list. >> >> > > When I send directly to a sublist normally the replies should only go to the sublist and not to any umbrella list >> In theory, one of the other of those should have the desired effect. >> >> >> > > Now I solved the problem with procmail using the FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=all#4.15 and the following procmailrc entry: RECIPIENT=`formail -zxTo:` :0fwh | formail -I "Reply-To: $RECIPIENT" :0 |/usr/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post ${MAILMAN} Martin ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
