--On Thursday, July 8, 2004 9:33 pm +0200 Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course it does! The whole point of the recipe is to deliver Mailman like VERP without the overhead in handoff of messages from Mailman to the MTA.
But you've got to make sure that the VERP format is the same. And how do you deal with recipient addresses which are themselves VERPed? How do you take a VERPed recipient address and then VERP that for inclusion in the envelope sender address?
Well, take a look at the recipe that I linked to in my first message in this thread.
You can let the MTA do the VERP for you. That is faster than letting mailman do it. <http://www.exim.org/howto/mailman21.html#verpex>
This part of the recipe makes it ignore already VERPed addresses # only the un-VERPed bounce addresses are handled senders = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
And this part defines the VERP format.
return_path = \
${local_part:$return_path}+$original_local_part=\
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:$return_path}
--
Ian Eiloart
Servers Team
Sussex University ITS------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
