The attached testcase mbox, when processed by the archive script, wrongly index the first mail to currente date (july 2004) instead of its real date (february 2002). CUriously, the second one is OK. Any idea ?

I'm using backported package 2.1.2-6.99.99.jones.0 on Debian, if it matters.

katu3:/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/plf-discuss.mbox# /usr/lib/mailman/bin/arch --wipe -s 0 -e 1 plf-discuss
#00000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
figuring article archives
2004-July
#00001 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
figuring article archives
2002-February
Updating index files for archive [2004-July]
Date
Subject
Author
Thread
Computing threaded index
Updating HTML for article 0
Updating index files for archive [2002-February]
Date
Subject
Author
Thread
Computing threaded index
Updating HTML for article 1
Pickling archive state into /var/lib/mailman/archives/private/plf-discuss/pipermail.pck


>From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue Feb  5 08:44:57 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katu.zarb.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by zarb.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id A8611278; Tue,  5 Feb 2002 08:44:57 -0500 (EST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Yves Duret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 05 Feb 2002 14:44:57 +0100
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Guillaume Rousse's message of "Tue, 5 Feb 2002 
14:12:04 +0100")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 35
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) Emacs/21.0.104
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [Plf-discuss] Re: PLF structure
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: <plf-discuss.zarb.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://lists.zarb.org/pipermail/plf-discuss/>

following on plf-disccus ml..

Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Guys, i would like to advance on this issue, as it is the last one to solve
> before going public.

[...]

> But maybe mdk people, who have more experience on this, or people in charge
> of other arch/distributions have better idea.

the mdk arch is almost the same:
05/02 14:41 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt/BIG/distrib% ls
8.1@  cooker/  incoming/  ppc/  rawhide/  stable@  unsupported@  updates@ vitamin/
05/02 14:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt/BIG/distrib% cd cooker
05/02 14:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt/BIG/distrib/cooker% ll
total 72
lrwxrwxrwx    1 mandrake root            5 Dec 14 21:10 cooker -> i586//
lrwxrwxrwx    1 mandrake rpm            13 Dec 14 21:38 ppc -> ../ppc/cooker/
drwxrwsr-x    3 mandrake rpm          4096 Aug  2  2001 ia64/
drwxr-xr-x    9 mandrake rpm          4096 Feb  5 11:48 i586/
drwxr-xr-x    7 mandrake rpm          4096 Sep  1  2000 contrib/
drwxrwsr-x    6 mandrake alpha        4096 Sep 11  2000 alpha/
drwxr-xr-x    7 mandrake rpm          4096 Jan  2 12:21 ../
drwxr-xr-x    7 mandrake rpm          4096 Oct 10 17:20 ./
drwxrwxr-x    2 mandrake rpm         49152 Feb  5 14:02 SRPMS/

thus i vote for your proposal :)

--
Yves Duret
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
piouk toujours et meme apres !


>From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue Feb  5 10:33:27 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129])
        by zarb.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83737278
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  5 Feb 2002 10:33:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from silbermann.snv.jussieu.fr (silbermann.snv.jussieu.fr [134.157.138.163])
          by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.12.1/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id g15FXOYD043507
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:33:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: by silbermann.snv.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 501)
        id 2D3C449B; Tue,  5 Feb 2002 16:31:02 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: =?iso8859-1?q?Universit=E9=20Pierre=20&=20Marie?= Curie
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:31:01 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Plf-discuss] Re: PLF structure
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: <plf-discuss.zarb.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://lists.zarb.org/pipermail/plf-discuss/>

Ainsi parlait Stefan van der Eijk :
[..]
> Isn't this the way that Mandrake puts their stuff on the web at the
> moment (alpha, ia64, i586, ppc, etc). I like your suggestion (will make
> it easier for me to mirror too).
OK, it's done. Stefan, Buchan, if you have access, you can begin to uplod
your packages there. Caution, you need to give your files to plf group (this
should be done automatically), and group-writable too. Goetz, you need to
correct the package you've uploaded this morning :-)

I've also updated rpm2html configuration, so i think we could safely drop the
original php page.

There is still the question of urpmi index, as we need now one index for
every distribution/arch combination. I'm currently enquiring...
--
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

Reply via email to