On 10/4/2004 14:04, "Brad Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:24 AM -0700 2004-10-04, John W. Baxter wrote: > >> Now look at Qualcom's MUA products and their implementation of the RFC. >> This appears to be low priority, in that Eudora 5 and 6 have emerged since >> the RFC. > > Qualcomm does just fine in this respect. Qualcomm is not the > problem. Not that I had noticed. Although I don't read many mailing lists in Mac Eudora any more. (Also, I wasn't the original accuser of Qualcomm.) OK, so what does Eudora do to make the RFC 2919 headers useful? All I think it does out of the box is not filter any of them in its presentation of a message, leading to endless complaints about "those headers" and being the prime trigger for Mailman's current ability to turn them off. (Then there was fine-tuning about the List-Post vs announce-only lists, not caused by Eudora.) Adding them to the Boring Headers list is easier in Mac Eudora than in Windows Eudora, and I added most of them to the list in Mac Eudora, so that I had a chance of reading the actual message without scrolling. (I did edit the appropriate .ini file for Windows Eudora once...that edit was lost in the death of a hard drive (my Windows machine isn't important enough to justify the level of backups which would have gotten it back)). --John ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
