On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 09:50 +0100, Andy Heath wrote: > If someone could do an ls -R or ls -lR (if there are links) > of a 2.1.5 mailman directory and post it it would help figure > out where fedora puts all the pieces (I'll build a list of > links from it so it looks like a normal mailman directory and > I can work with it more easily).
There are two much easier ways to get this information: 1) read the documentation (/usr/share/doc/mailman-*/INSTALL.REDHAT) 2) rpm -ql mailman (-ql prints a package file list) > OFF-TOPIC below: > > Standards compliance (fedora) is one thing (I work in standards) > but when everyone already has a fine standard (put it in the > mailman user directory) and the community has no plans > to change that then i find it very silly to just throw > that away The directory change was dictated by the need to integrate with the SELinux security policy. This is a positive technology advancement. Adhering to the FHS (Filesystem Hierarchy Standard) is a stated goal and appreciated by many. Most people prefer distributions that integrate packages into a coherent system that follow established rules. Individual package defaults are not a standard. -- John Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp