Alex Schuilenburg wrote: > >Hopefully sometime I will get the time to clean this up to actually make >this an option, rather than modify the normal behaviour. i.e. The >options for "require_explicit_destination" become > No | Hold for Approval | Reject | Discard > >Does anyone else think this a useful change?
Yes. It was just submitted as an RFE (not by me) at <http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1387243&group_id=103&atid=350103>. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
