At 10:14 PM -0500 2006-01-29, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> Well, I disagree with the current procedure, which based on past emails,
> suggests that no one is kept informed about security concerns, and only
> those that hear about one on their own can get a private response by
> emailing mailman-security.
I think our security record is much better than most other
open-source projects, and I think that we have much more open and
frank discussions between the principal developers and the
wheels-meet-the-road admins, owners, and moderators than most other
open-source projects.
We don't deserve to be treated like this, especially not by the
likes of you.
>> But if you can't (or won't) follow the proper procedures, then I
>> think it's perfectly reasonable to ask that you go somewhere else.
>
> Thanks, I'll think more of you because you think I should go. <sigh>
Frankly, I don't care what you think of me. I care that you are
willing and able to follow the specified procedures, and if you can't
(or won't) do that then you don't belong here.
> Perhaps I am not the stumbling block here.
I think you're stumbling over your own feet. Maybe you want to
take them out of your mouth once in a while.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
LOPSA member since December 2005. See <http://www.lopsa.org/>.
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
