On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 13:27 -0500, Neal Groothuis wrote: > > I'd like to work up an unofficial diff to Mailman 2.1 for people like > > Stephen who are willing to give it a try on a live site. > > I'm not sure this is even necessary. > > Ezmlm doesn't touch the Sender: header at all, Majordomo sets it to the > owner of the list, and (AFAICT) Listserv sets it to the list itself. > This would seem to me to indicate that incidences of mail being returned > inappropriately to the sender are infrequent, at worst.
As I said, I think it's defensible to claim Mailman is the originator, but practicality beats purity, and I do think a list manager falls into a gray area here. Having said all that, you might be right, in that we really don't need to do much except remove the addition of the Sender: header in bulkdeliver(). -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
