On 8/24/06 6:48 AM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See > <http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq02.003.htp>. Unfortunately, both domains used in the examples at the top of that FAQ entry exist (although the FQDNs of the hosts mailman and poster within those domains do not, so having the FAQ as is isn't TOO bad). Is there any interest in sanitizing the FAQ by adjusting examples to follow RFC 2606 as closely as possible? I'm reasonably sure that 2.003 isn't the only entry which could use adjustment. "As closely as possible" because we wouldn't want to confuse things by putting the mailman server AND the poster both into the example.{com,org,net} domains. But we could use mailman.example or mailman.something.example for the server and poster.example.com for the poster without TOO much confusion. --John ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
