At 10:50 AM -0500 9/27/06, Barry Finkel wrote: > Is there 2.1.8 code that has not > been ported to the Ubuntu 2.1.5-9?
Dunno. You need to ask the people who created the binary package you're using. > Is there code that Ubuntu (or its >"source" Debian) has written that has not been sent to Free Software >Foundation? Dunno. Again, you need to ask them. > I do not know what was needed to "debianize" the code; Neither do we. > I would have > assumed that the code from the FSF would run on any Linux without > modification. Should do, yes. But maybe they want files put in different places than we do, or perhaps there are some other internal changes we don't know about. > If any mods were needed, the FSF developers would > be told and integrate any needed changes into their source tree. We would certainly take a look at any of their suggested changes and see what makes sense to incorporate into our code base, yes. > I could envision a few changes, maybe to install mailman into different > directories to match the Debian standards, but 83 modules that are > different seems to be too many. I agree, that seems like a lot. -- Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755 Founding Individual Sponsor of LOPSA. See <http://www.lopsa.org/>. ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp