At 10:08 AM -0500 10/9/06, Patrick Bogen wrote:
> Not trying to be rude;
Of course.
> it just seemed to me that for security issues
> in the code (rather than, say, conceptual security issues), the
> appropriate place to start would be mailman-developers- and the list
> members there would be better equipped to know what's going on. But,
> it could just be that I have a flawed understanding of the exact
> purpose of our various lists.
For security-related issues, we prefer to route things through the
appropriately controlled list. We'd rather not have discussions of
security-related subjects on a public list. Once Barry, Tokio, Mark,
or one of the other core developers approve, the discussion could be
moved to mailman-developers.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
Founding Individual Sponsor of LOPSA. See <http://www.lopsa.org/>.
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
