On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 01:25:15PM -0700, John W. Baxter wrote: > I wasn't referring to sender verification callbacks (which we do not use). > I was referring to recipient verification callforwards, where the edge MTA > doesn't know valid recipients but some internal (or even customer) MTA does. > Exim can configure these easily (but that doesn't help because Mailman > doesn't act like an MTA). I don't know about any other MTAs in this regard.
Ah, understood. *Those* I highly approve of, since they at least help mitigate accept-then-bounce issues due to non-existent recipient addresses at the final/internal/destination MTA. Whether it's done by callforwards, or LDAP lookups, or script-generated virtual user tables, or aliases, or whatever, I'm all for it. ---Rsk ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
