Christopher X. Candreva wrote: >On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> This is a security and bug fix release and it is highly recommended >> that all sites upgrade to this version. Mailman 2.1.10 also adds support > >Quick clarification: It's somewhat unusuall for it to be recommended that >all sites upgrade to a release candidate. Am I to understand that the >recommendation is for sites running 2.1.9 release updates to the 2.1.10rc1 >-- or just those running previous 2.1.10 betas ?
There are two security issues mentioned in the announcement. The first of these was exposed and addressed in 2.1.10b1 and the second in 2.1.10rc1. That is the reason for the recommendation. However, per the previously announced schedule, the 2.1.10 final release is expected to be available on April 21, so if you've waited this long, you might as well wait for the final. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
