kalin m wrote:

>both musiclist/config.pck and musiclist/config.pck.last look pretty much 
>the same but not like any 'normal' config.pck
>
>they have a bunch of lines like:
>
>                                                  <UserDesc 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] () [odufat] [digest? no] [en]>),
>    'fb27c0e1ec56a5295f66992ba4463215b2291936': (   'S',
>                                                    <UserDesc 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] () [naunka] [digest? no] [en]>),
>    'fb3bef120543c177653d5057e699f2294368a2cc': (   'S',
>                                                    <UserDesc 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] () [rakono] [digest? no] [en]>),
>    'fb8efc7f43e9c068ca0cbc1e8c49f8e3227cdfaa': (   'S',
>                                                    <UserDesc 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] () [nietfu] [digest? no] [en]>),
>    'fba45bf178def81da36ea77b5ef5e440f1fd2b7a': (   'S',
>
>
>i assume this makes them corrupt....


That is a pending.pck file with a bunch of pending subscription
requests waiting user confirmation.

So the question is how did config.pck get overwritten/replaced by
pending.pck?

Perhaps we'll never know?

-- 
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9

Reply via email to