Helmut Schneider wrote: > >As far as I can see this patch works great. As a positive side effect, is it >possible that this patch also affects uncaught bounces? I recieve lots of >uncaught bounces now where a SPAM-filter was required before the patch.
No. The patch has absolutely no effect on uncaught bounces. Uncaught bounces are messages sent to a LIST-bounces address that are not VERPed and are not recognized as DSNs. If spam is sent to a LIST-bounces address and makes it to Mailman, it will be an unrecognized bounce. SpamDetect.py and header_filter_rules are not involved at all in processing mail received at a LIST-bounces address. Any change you observed in uncaught bounces is just a coincidence. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
