J.A. Terranson wrote: > > If i reject a posting for exceeding size limits, the reason given >will be "no reason given" if I reject using the default interface, and >will only state the correct reason (too bog, please trim) if I reject from >the "details" interface. > > This is both unintuitive and wrong: It was held for size, the >first notice says it was held for size, and it is rejected for the reason >held. Shouldnt the default reason (the reason for being held) be the >reject reason?
Yes, it probably should. It currently doesn't primarily because the message metadata which contains the reason is not retrieved during processing of actions from the admindb summary form. I think the reason for this is historical. I'm working on a fix. -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
