On 01/16/09 16:27, Brad Knowles wrote:
Validation could be useful, but the more important issue is to have
Mailman completely encapsulate signed/encrypted messages and then add
whatever additional MIME bodyparts may be necessary to complete the
other parts of the work it has been configured to do.
This is true for DKIM, PGP/MIME, and S/MIME alike. And any other form
of signed and/or encrypted message.
Don't change anything at all in any of the signed/encrypted part, just
treat it as an opaque object and encapsulate the whole thing.
It sounded like that is what Mailman already did and that by doing so
broke the signature. I will have to go back and re-read if it is
possible to graft the existing MIME tree in to another larger MIME tree
with out invalidating it.
Grant. . . .
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
