On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 01:51:48PM -0600, Barry Finkel wrote: >> I was surprised to learn last week that RFC 2822 has been made >> obsolete by RFC 5322, and 2821 by 5321. I think that the major >> changes wre to clear up sections where there were differences of >> interpretation.
and Adam McGreggor <adam-mail...@amyl.org.uk> replied: >I saw the update/obsoletion via http://twitter.com/rfc I was a subscriber to the DRUMS mailing list when that group was revising RFCs 821 and 822 to produce 2821 and 2822. I do not remember having unsubscribed from that list, but I have seen no activity on that list after 2821 and 2822 were issued. So, revisions to those two RFCs caught me by surprise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Barry S. Finkel Computing and Information Systems Division Argonne National Laboratory Phone: +1 (630) 252-7277 9700 South Cass Avenue Facsimile:+1 (630) 252-4601 Building 222, Room D209 Internet: bsfin...@anl.gov Argonne, IL 60439-4828 IBMMAIL: I1004994 ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
