Mark Sapiro wrote: > IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) wrote: >> >>a user of one of my mailinglists noted that the thread-view of my >>mailing-list archives has become weird in the last months: basically new >>threads are sometimes subthreads of unrelated threads. >>while there is always the chance, that users will just hijack a thread, >>i am pretty sure that this did not happen in various other cases (i >>looked at the headers of the mails coming in through the list, and they >>did not refer to any other mails) > > > Look at the messages in archives/private/pd-list.mbox/pd-list.mbox. The > archives are threaded by message-id in References: and/or In-Reply-To: > > If messages are threaded without one of those headers referencing a > prior message in the thread, then there is a problem with pipermail, > but if the header is there, it is a problem with the user or the > user's MUA.
I wasn't sure, but I see that the References: and In-Reply-To: headers are kept in the periodic .txt files so I looked at <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2009-03.txt> and I see that as you say, there are messages that don't have any References: or In-Reply-To: header that are still threaded with other messages. However, I have not seen this elsewhere with 2.1.9 or 2.1.11. Do you suppose it could be related to your date hack? -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
