On Jul 22, 2009, at 4:02 AM, Stefan Förster wrote:
* Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> wrote:There are many tools available for dealing with spam at this level thatare much more effective than Mailman is.Since I've read this several times in the past months, it makes me wonder if it is planned to drop some of the content filtering features that mailman provides in MM3. I really hope that MM3 will continue to provide at least the possibility to cut some unwanted attachment types, ignore the HTML part of a mail and so on. I totally agree that spam prevention is a much more suitable task for a MTA or a dedicated content filtering framework like amavisd-new, but I think that some minimal filtering functionalitiy should be retained in MM3.
I have no plans to drop these features, though I might not "market" them as spam fighting measures.
-Barry
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
