Oh I know WHY it was done. However, being a [CENSORED] I would have
said "Get a real client or report the bug to the mothership and hope
[HAHAHA CACKLE CACKLE SNORT] they get around to fixing it."
You can't give those bastards an inch.
--
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 11, 2009, at 15:48, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote:
On Sep 11, 2009, at 3:16 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 11-Sep-2009, at 11:41, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Yes, that's the way it works, but maybe it shouldn't. What do people
think about changing this?
Well, I'd be in favor of forcing the rfc2369 headers to always be
there, myself. I hate it when lists don't have them.
Historically, the option to remove them was added because people
complained that their MUA (that shall remain nameless) could not
hide them.
-Barry
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
