Albert ARIBAUD writes: > Regarding your suggestion of better spam detection at the earliest > stage, I agree wholeheartedly. But while I might be able to suggest > mailman settings to the list owner, heavier actions such as changing the > spam detection methods in place on the list are out of question.
Well, it might be possible in cases of repeated spam to add rules to the mailman spam checker. If not, or that's not timely enough, it's too bad, because I suspect that to get treatment of 5xx statuses changed based on the DSN text you'll need to hack the source and restart Mailman (Python will automatically recompile out-of-date .pycs, so you don't need to worry about rebuilding Mailman). But that sounds like a heavier action too. Don't lose hope yet, though, I'm not authoritative on this, I just seem to remember that to the the case. ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
