Jeff Grossman wrote: > >Are you sure about the 1.0 and 0.5 score based on soft and hard failure? >I think Mark has said previously that a soft and hard bounce both get >scored as 1.0.
The documentation on the Bounce processing page talks about the 0.5 and 1.0 score for a soft or hard bounce, but that's wrong (I really should change it, but doing so breaks every i18n translation rendering the entire documentation section of the page in English regardless of the list's language, so I don't). A "soft" bounce is scored as either 0 or 1 depending on what you consider a soft bounce. E.g., a 'delay' DSN is ignored (scored as 0), but a message which is undeliverable due to a full mailbox is probably scored as 1. It actually depends on the format of the DSN returned, but any RFC 3464 compliant DSN with a 'failed' action is scored as 1. -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
