* Mark Sapiro <[email protected]>: > This is controversial. See > <http://www.google.com/search?q=site:mail.python.org+inurl:mailman-developers+dkim>, > in particular, the thread beginning at > <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/2007-February/019346.html>. > Beginning with Mailman 2.1.7, Mailman unconditionally removed DKIM and > domainkey signature headers from incoming posts. Then, due to the > controversy, beginning with 2.1.10 there is a Defaults.py/mm_cfg.py > setting REMOVE_DKIM_HEADERS which controls this and which defaults to No. > > I understand that this doesn't help your situation, and trying to > convince all the potential operators of Mailman installations that host > lists that your users might mail to might be even more > frustrating/futile than trying to get Yahoo to do the right thing, but > based on past discussions, it seemed that defaulting Mailman's DKIM > signature removal to No was the right thing for Mailman.
Well, it's good to hear somebody put some thought into this :) -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 [email protected] | http://www.charite.de ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
