On Nov 07, 2011, at 07:24 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >And if you looked at the source, you should have seen the following >comment immediately preceding the adding of the footer. > ># BAW: This is not strictly conformant RFC 1153. The trailer is only ># supposed to contain two lines, i.e. the "End of ... Digest" line and ># the row of asterisks. If this screws up MUAs, the solution is to ># add the footer as the last message in the RFC 1153 digest. I just ># hate the way that VM does that and I think it's confusing to users, ># so don't do it unless there's a clamor.
Just to mention, I haven't used VM in a bajillion years, and in fact I very rarely use digests at all these days. So while this was very definitely a case of "I get to make my playground work for me", I have no problem with this code getting fixed to actually support the RFC, and not allowing a workaround for an obscure MUA break things for everyone else. Cheers, -Barry ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org