On 5/9/2012 7:17 AM, Futchko, Rose wrote:
Hello,
Yes, I meant 2.1.5 -- thank you.
This is the additional information:
<mail...@list.informs.org> 5/7/2012 9:58 AM>>>
This is a Mailman mailing list bounce action notice:
List: Listname
Member: email address
Action: Subscription disabled.
Reason: Excessive or fatal bounces.
The triggering bounce notice is attached below.
Questions? Contact the Mailman site administrator at
mail...@list.informs.org.
Received: from [64.56.46.224] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
q47Dm58n027853;
Mon, 7 May 2012 09:50:13 -0400
X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 mail.informs.org
q47Dm58n027853
Authentication-Results: mail.informs.org
sender=transci-logistics-society-boun...@list.informs.org;
sender-id=neutral; spf=neutral
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.2.1 mail.informs.org q47Dm58n027853
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=informs.org;
s=iol-mail;
t=1336398721; bh=nBoB7gLpyON0aTfYk/86AG+8qdc=;
h=Authentication-Results:Authentication-Results:From:To:Date:
Message-ID:Accept-Language:acceptlanguage:Subject:Sender;
b=DDR/BS
5R1Rg1ZFSefHd9sxFAzBL//DzEFLlSzj8ugS0fU0YaIJBnBo9/0tKK8eAKthApq60EL
NAV4j5wAFhn+5wnJcTRvqfRCsGH4i0ZGjFK3E4cFNFQeylcGs3po6mK4o7ChJn+L9Rq
UqaqYnbP8XM+y7nNLIv53AphKDs0QVU=
Received: from mail.informs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q47C8hZH014190
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256
verify=NO);
Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:43 -0400
X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 mail.informs.org
q47C8hZH014190
Authentication-Results: mail.informs.org from=elis...@umd.edu;
sender-id=neutral; spf=neutral
Received: (from root@localhost)
by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id q47C8hP3014187;
Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:43 -0400
Received: from sdc-mx1.umd.edu (sdc-mx1.umd.edu [128.8.162.150])
by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
q47C8f8l014174;
Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:41 -0400
X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 mail.informs.org
q47C8f8l014174
Authentication-Results: mail.informs.org from=elis...@umd.edu;
sender-id=neutral; spf=neutral
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result:
ArsCAKC6p0+ACAzogWdsb2JhbABEgkanDwGDEYZTAQEWJieCEAMFIAgBXQElAQEBCgoUBRAP
DCYBBAERAQgGDId0C7EkiQmQPGMEkBoBiS2PfQ
Received: from oitpmxht01.umd.edu (HELO exch.mail.umd.edu)
([128.8.12.232])
by sdc-mx1.umd.edu with ESMTP; 07 May 2012 08:08:40 -0400
Received: from oitmxcms01vi.AD.UMD.EDU ([169.254.1.122]) by
OITPMXHT01.AD.UMD.EDU ([128.8.12.232]) with mapi;
Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:40 -0400
From: Elise Miller-Hooks<elis...@umd.edu>
To: "transci-logistics-sect...@list.informs.org"
<transci-logistics-sect...@list.informs.org>,
"transci-logistics-soci...@list.informs.org"
<transci-logistics-soci...@list.informs.org>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:37 -0400
Thread-Topic: A great loss for the TSL Society
Thread-Index: Ac0sSaLy16gsDbusR+ShPb1Nsm9MIA==
Message-ID:
<0d78e3bee1f5c04ca3641f214ee381ad01a4eba48...@oitmxcms01vi.ad.umd.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=2.9
tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable
version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
mail.informs.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 07 May 2012 09:48:04 -0400
Cc:
Subject: [Transci-logistics-society] A great loss for the TSL Society
X-BeenThere: transci-logistics-soci...@list.informs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transportation Science and Logistics Society of INFORMS
<transci-logistics-society.list.informs.org>
List-Unsubscribe:
<http://list.informs.org/mailman/listinfo/transci-logistics-society>,
<mailto:transci-logistics-society-requ...@list.informs.org?subject=unsub
scribe>
List-Archive:
<http://list.informs.org/pipermail/transci-logistics-society>
List-Post:<mailto:transci-logistics-soci...@list.informs.org>
List-Help:
<mailto:transci-logistics-society-requ...@list.informs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<http://list.informs.org/mailman/listinfo/transci-logistics-society>,
<mailto:transci-logistics-society-requ...@list.informs.org?subject=subsc
ribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1216496403=="
Sender: transci-logistics-society-boun...@list.informs.org
Errors-To: transci-logistics-society-boun...@list.informs.org
Return-path:<>
Received: from mail.informs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q47ER99A006791
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256
verify=NO)
for
<transci-logistics-society-boun...@list.informs.org.procmail>;
Mon, 7 May 2012 10:27:10 -0400
X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 mail.informs.org
q47ER99A006791
Authentication-Results: mail.informs.org
from=mailer-dae...@mail.informs.org;
sender-id=neutral; spf=neutral
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.2.1 mail.informs.org q47ER99A006791
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=informs.org;
s=iol-mail;
t=1336400836; bh=r/uqa39i9pKtHAwopuBeggH2Cus=; h=Date:From:
Message-Id:To:Subject:Auto-Submitted;
b=rwpTPxmFKIgMnHAesV2Zf6JDRH
BdYIdKlntNcVfBWoTCzbsdoC9xR0fQ1oIehAPHZKF8NBIaVR2ENgw+LxqIRlDSv6VLi
NvjEkjUFOt9vOjH1aoXj3Bz8h238kx8JeOaOaH6QW9EaqqsVis0cLq9YwVD01EwoeCy
FS9CNF2l9xU=
Received: (from root@localhost)
by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id q47ER9dQ006788
for transci-logistics-society-boun...@list.informs.org.procmail;
Mon, 7 May 2012 10:27:09 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost)
by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) id q47ER58i028269;
Mon, 7 May 2012 10:27:05 -0400
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:27:05 -0400
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem<mailer-dae...@mail.informs.org>
Message-Id:<201205071427.q47er58i028...@mail.informs.org>
To:<transci-logistics-society-boun...@list.informs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
boundary="q47ER58i028269.1336400825/mail.informs.org"
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.9
tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
mail.informs.org
Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.informs.org
Received-From-MTA: DNS; localhost
Arrival-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:50:13 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; kenneth.k...@canterbury.ac.nz
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx1.canterbury.ac.nz
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal
user:kenneth.k...@canterbury.ac.nz
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:53:26 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; martin.savelsbe...@csiro.au
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; act-mx.csiro.au
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:54:06 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; dlag...@deis.unica.it
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.2
Remote-MTA: DNS; deis.unica.it
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Host unknown
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:54:24 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; muhammad.mazahi...@etudiants.ensam.eu
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: DNS; mail-in.ensam.eu
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 511 Destinataire inconnu - Recipient unknown
-(muhammad.mazahi...@etudiants.ensam.eu)
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:57:39 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; kroodber...@fac.fbk.eur.nl
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; mercury.fbk.eur.nl
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP;550 5.1.1<kroodber...@fac.fbk.eur.nl>: Recipient
addressrejected: User unknown
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:57:43 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; dad...@fhwr-berlin.de
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.2
Remote-MTA: DNS; fhwr-berlin.de
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Host unknown
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:57:58 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; a.stra...@lancaster.ac.uk
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; whobblebury.lancs.ac.uk
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Invalid recipient address
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:04:41 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; eduardo.soa...@latop.com.br
Action: failed
Status: 5.7.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx5.infolink.com.br
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554
5.7.1<64-56-46-224.isp.comcastbusiness.net[64.56.46.224]>: Clienthost
rejected: =myspam gold= We don't accept Direct Deliveryfrom
Dial-up/DSL/CABLE/Wireless/3G networks. If you are NOTdoing E-mail
Marketing/Opt-in/Opt-out/SPAM/UCE (which areforbidden here), please
contact ab...@infolink.com.br with thecomplete ERROR MESSAGE to be
analized.
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:04:46 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; b...@man.dtu.dk
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; filter2.ait.dtu.dk
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP;550 5.1.1<b...@man.dtu.dk>... Sorry, no mailbox
here by thatname or mailbox is over quota
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:06:30 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; ra...@man.dtu.dk
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; filter2.ait.dtu.dk
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP;550 5.1.1<ra...@man.dtu.dk>... Sorry, no mailbox
here bythat name or mailbox is over quota
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:06:30 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; liebc...@math.tu-berlin.de
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; mail.tu-berlin.de
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Recipient verify failed
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:06:56 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; k.akartun...@ms.unimelb.edu.au
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; puffer.ms.unimelb.edu.au
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550<k.akartun...@ms.unimelb.edu.au>: Recipient
addressrejected: User unknown in local recipient table
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:10:15 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; comb...@ornl.gov
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; mta02.ornl.gov
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:15:07 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; jlancas...@qatarairways.com.qa
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx1.qatarairways.com.qa
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:15:50 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; schin...@transmartconsulting.gr
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.2
Remote-MTA: DNS; transmartconsulting.gr
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Host unknown
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:19:19 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; kwanghun.ch...@uclouvain.be
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; smtp.sgsi.ucl.ac.be
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP;550 5.1.1<kwanghun.ch...@uclouvain.be>: Recipient
addressrejected: unknown address
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:21:47 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; seher...@uniandes.edu.co
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; avmx02.uniandes.edu.co
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 Recipient address rejected: User
unknown
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:24:44 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; js...@ust.hk
Action: failed
Status: 5.3.0
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx1.ust.hk
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 553 5.3.0<js...@ust.hk>... Recipient address no
longerexists
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:25:27 -0400
The original message was received at Mon, 7 May 2012 09:50:13 -0400 from
localhost [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<kenneth.k...@canterbury.ac.nz>
(reason: 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal user:
kenneth.k...@canterbury.ac.nz)<martin.savelsbe...@csiro.au>
(reason: 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.)<dlag...@deis.unica.it>
(reason: 550 Host unknown)
<muhammad.mazahi...@etudiants.ensam.eu>
(reason: 511 Destinataire inconnu - Recipient unknown -
(muhammad.mazahi...@etudiants.ensam.eu))
<kroodber...@fac.fbk.eur.nl>
(reason: 550 5.1.1<kroodber...@fac.fbk.eur.nl>: Recipient address
rejected: User unknown)<dad...@fhwr-berlin.de>
(reason: 550 Host unknown)
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 7:25 PM
To: Futchko, Rose
Cc: mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Help with Bounce Processing
On 5/7/2012 2:17 PM, Futchko, Rose wrote:
We are using Mailman 2.15 and have an unusual problem that I was
hoping that someone can help me with.
There is no 2.15. Do you mean 2.1.5?
We have close to 109 lists running
successfully, however there are times when bounce processing sends the
following message (over 100 times) in the span of a few hours to one
user/subscriber to the list. They are not the admin:
This is a Mailman mailing list bounce action notice:
Without seeing the complete message with all headers, it is virtually
impossible to guess what may be happening. Can you post a complete
message example with all headers?
I have looked at the rejection mail, and there are things that I do not
understand; maybe critical information has been modified/obscured.
It appears that a piece of mail was sent:
From: Elise Miller-Hooks <elis...@umd.edu>
To: "transci-logistics-sect...@list.informs.org"
<transci-logistics-sect...@list.informs.org>,
"transci-logistics-soci...@list.informs.org"
<transci-logistics-soci...@list.informs.org>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:37 -0400
The mail that was sent appears to be a "rejection message" from some
mail that was
sent to a large number of invalid addresses. I am not sure why the
sender sent the
mail to two mailing lists. If the lists are archived, look at the
archives to see what
the original mail was. In my experience with Mailman, mail sent to a
list would
result in undeliverables returned back to the LISTNAME-bounce address,
and Mailman
would process those undeliverables. If the list is so-configured, then
the last bounce
(that causes a subscriber's bounce score to reach its limit) will be
sent to the list
owner(s). With no knowledge of your lists, I do not know if this sender,
Elise Miller-Hooks, is a list owner and by mistake re-sent a rejection
message back
to the list.
--Barry Finkel
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
