>From the reports I've received, it looks as if they redact only from the headers. With personalization on, I put a "%(user_address)s" token in the non-digest footer and as of the last report I got (June 8) it came through the feedback loop intact. I've never figured out a similar fix for digests, however, and that seems to be where most of the reports come from. So maybe there's room for a new approach there.
rac ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Lindsay Haisley <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:54:34 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] AOL redacts user addresses even with VERP and > full personalization enabled > On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 20:42 -0400, Dave (FitEyes) wrote: > > Now that you motivated me, I actually read the blog post too: > > > http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2008/08/13/more-on-the-upcoming-feedback-loop-conversion/ > > > > It now seems pretty clear that we can use these reports in the way > > Lindsay and others have proposed. > > > Well if this is so, are they still redacting the VERP recipient > addresses? > > -- > Lindsay Haisley | "We are all broken toasters, but we still > FMP Computer Services | manage to make toast" > 512-259-1190 | > http://www.fmp.com | - Cheryl Dehut > > > ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
