Rusty Newton wrote: >Mailman version 2.1.11 >Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition)
And whose package? See the FAQ at <http://wiki.list.org/x/OIDD>. >Has anyone seen this before? Yes >Example of the issue: >http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2012-September/thread.html This appears to be a manifestation of a problem caused by a bad Debian/Ubuntu patch. See <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2010-April/069328.html>. The underlying bug reported at <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=167758> was fixed in GNU Mailman 2.1.13 in a way that doesn't break threading, and the Debian patch is not in any current Debian packages. I don't know how this happened if you didn't do anything. Perhaps it was just unreported. Assuming this is caused by the bad Debian patch, I think in order to fix it, you need to remove the bad patch, fix a few problems in archives/private/asterisk-users.mbox/asterisk-users.mbox and run bin/arch --wipe asterisk-users. The problems I see are incorrect dates (May 2016 instead of Sep 2006) in the From_ separator of those posts indexed at <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2016-May/thread.html>. Note that there is a possibility that running bin/arch --wipe could alter some or many message numbers, thus invalidating any saved URLs to messages. -- Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
