Chris Nulk wrote: > My regex filter is: > > ^Subject:[\s\+]*\[.*\]\s+(Invitation|Canceled Event):.*
I know you've resolved this and that the issue was that header_filter_rules are processed way before the subject_prefix is added so you didn't want the '\[.*\]'part of the pattern, but I'm confused by the '[\s\+]*' part of the pattern which says match 0 or more occurrences of the character class consisting of any white space character (\s) and the plus sign (either \+ or just + would be equivalent here, + loses its special meaning inside []). So, is [\s\+]* a typo or did you just mean \s+ or \s*? > Also, can any of the sender/recipient filters cause the message to bypass the > spam filters? The message pipeline is unchanged. No. header_filter_rules are processed by SpamDetect which is the first module in the pipeline. As you discovered, the CookHeaders module which adds the subject_prefix comes much later, and the sender/recipient filters are processed by Moderate which also comes later. -- Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
