On 05/13/2014 10:47 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> Today I experimented with first_strip_reply_to set to No. >> >> This means that a reply is addressed to both the list and to previous >> author. >> If nodups = Yes. >> Then the previous author will get only 1 copy of the message. But the copy >> they get is the direct mail (including senders email address), not the list >> mail. When that person replies to the message, it will only go to the most >> recent previous author, not to the list. >> >> Maybe this is acceptable(?), since most of the time people don't reply to >> their own list messages? > > DMARC has forced mitigation responses. As far as I can tell, there are > no ways to deal with this that don't involve impacts on message > readability, replies or both other than not accepting messages From: > domains with DMARC p=reject. > > >
I have chosen, at least temporarily, to rewrite the from header as follows: s/^(From:.*)([^ \t<>]+)@((yahoo|aol)\.com)/\1\2-AT-\3...@mydomain.com/ So, addresses get rewritten as: From: yahoousername-at-yahoo....@mydomain.com and I do this only for domains which use p=reject and I make sure that there is always a reply-to header, since the From is no longer a valid email address. My sense is that someone could come up with arguments as to why this is a bad idea, but so far I like what it looks like to the user better than other options I have seen. I have not yet installed the 2.1.18 release though I hope to do that soon. Nataraj ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
