Stephen J. wrote: > > > Thanks, I think we're safe from all those methods, but I also think > > it would be safer to leave the name blank, just in case something > > changes. > > You are right about safer, but note that at least one Mailman > developer (me) would consider inadvertantly exposing more personal > information in a future version than we do now to be a regression, and > a fairly high priority one at that. Unfortunately, privacy is not > something we can take lightly these days.
The sort of changes I was referring to were us changing the settings for our installation of mailman. I think that's way more likely than future version changes. ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
