Sorry, serious finger fumble there. Please ignore the messed up one. Andrew Hodgson writes:
> That is interesting, and I wonder if this is something to do with > the way that Redhat have implemented the new feature. My guess is that Red Hat backported 2.1.17 or 2.1.18-1. After getting complaints, Mark S fixed things so that the From address was moved to Cc rather than Reply-To in 2.1.19 or 2.1.20. > Is there any way you could just upgrade your installation to the > latest 2.1.20? There are some compiling guides out there for > Redhat/Centos systems that were designed to get people through this > before Redhat backported the feature. It's easy enough to do, but beware of installing into the same places that Red Hat/CentOS uses, as that is quite likely to result in various problems if you try to upgrade the Mailman package from the OS vendor. On the other hand, using a source build installed to the default /var/local hierarchy means you'll need to copy the site config mm_cfg.py, the list configs, and the archives to the new location, and teach the webserver and mailserver about the new Mailman. In principle it's pretty straightforward and I haven't hesitated to do so on several occasions, but I can understand why an admin might be nervous (or they might have a rule that all installed software must be controlled by the system's PMS, and that's a good rule that shouldn't be violated lightly). ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
