On 08/27/2015 08:32 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Woody Mon via Mailman-Users writes: > > > So I tried entering RegExp ^.*+ but Mailman rejected this entry. > > That's illegal syntax for a regexp because "+" is an operator. > > The version you want is "^.*\+". However, that is a very bad idea if > you have any posters with email skills, because embedding "+" in the > return address for outgoing mail is a common way to identify the > source of incoming replies. > > A more conservative regexp would be "^[a-z]+\+[0-9]+@" which will > catch the pattern of LETTERS "+" DIGITS.
Also, see my reply to Nelson Kelly at <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2015-August/079671.html>. -- Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
