We are a Google Apps for Education school so most of our employees and students
are using gmail but with our own thet.net <http://thet.net/> domain. We have mx
records for gmails servers and for our in house mailman server. Recently edited
our DNS zones due to SPF record check failures. Also, recently had to change
out IP block due to changes at our ISP. Here is the header info from a message
that I got from our Dean. It got flagged as Spam somewhere along the way.
It should be noted that some of the lists below are umbrella lists.
{Spam?} [TA Admin] {Spam?} [Employees] {Spam?} [Claws] {Spam?} SNOWBALL IS
CANCELLED FOR TONIGHT
To: [email protected] [email protected]
X-Thetnet-Mailscanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Sender: [email protected]
List-Archive: <http://lists.thet.net/mailman/private/admin/>
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify)
[email protected]; spf=fail (google.com: domain of
[email protected] does not designate 104.219.98.14 as permitted
sender) [email protected]
X-Received: by 10.55.20.95 with SMTP id e92mr9675564qkh.54.1481993433047; Sat,
17 Dec 2016 08:50:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.13.204.67 with SMTP id o64mr6487069ywd.47.1481993249239; Sat,
17 Dec 2016 08:47:29 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
X-Original-To: [email protected]
X-Original-To: [email protected]
X-Original-To: [email protected]
X-Thetnet-Mailscanner-Spamscore: sssssss, sssssss, sssss, sssss
X-Gm-Message-State:
AKaTC03CGHzT3zezdGpZ3HNvRPiPVZelD2bKmhcA8Wn9WsDZT93E/DWWFFAFrbExpkGdZ0xWfYUPvqPLwJXAyg==
List-Id: Interactive mailing list for TA Administrators <admin.lists.thet.net>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net;
s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=8F82G0kwQs0BGWAs4rc0JlbGrQ5jSEAp9BGHHsLlJGQ=;
b=XDw9OtI9GY0saYUhV9g6nVzCeS2/FHyuJUbb3YrEZtrQAg+GOI9B1chbVDYuIDm9Ip
EpVs8ERwixZfcbO+hRhz21h6dmm1kRorFGHjVKUjt9fOONcqX0C3i0FPy+VHgxf4nPnT
5wzEquSIGU7I5YoUNFK7AR6pqPCRXqEaS4t9Aa0Q9njL2Y2XEh+dw1z1e3XreibJMMr6
kYmbFTM6YcxBprB6XJCHzVI4R51a9L2CmxJCHn8X+ULXsligpbAIr8vnMxT8QjAxejM6
A1kiQZG57hSs4B/8R8TQeX3jj2QpF1XULvdkLgxDlskybV2LdQP2tTpDf9aI0TnXO+bg ralw==
X-Thetnet-Mailscanner-Spamcheck: spam, SORBS-SPAM, SpamAssassin (cached,
score=7.315, required 5, BAYES_00 -1.90, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL 2.70, HTML_MESSAGE
0.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.00, SORTED_RECIPS 2.50, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 1.51,
SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.51), spam, SpamAssassin (cached, score=7.315, required 5,
BAYES_00 -1.90, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL 2.70, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
-0.00, SORTED_RECIPS 2.50, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 1.51, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.51), spam,
SpamAssassin (not cached, score=5.809, required 5, BAYES_00 -1.90,
DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL 2.70, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.00,
SORTED_RECIPS 2.50, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.51), spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
score=5.809, required 5, BAYES_00 -1.90, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL 2.70, HTML_MESSAGE
0.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.00, SORTED_RECIPS 2.50, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.51)
X-Thetnet-Mailscanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean, Found to be clean,
Found to be clean
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
Errors-To: [email protected]
Message-Id: <cacaqbrtud-haaof54gcwrqqffha6q3gmqvbnecrmnzvngfi...@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes
X-Thetnet-Mailscanner-From: [email protected]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Precedence: list
Received: by 10.80.136.105 with SMTP id c38csp743701edc; Sat, 17 Dec 2016
08:50:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dispatch.thet.net ([104.219.98.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS
id n185si342354qke.282.2016.12.17.08.50.32 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA
bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Dec 2016 08:50:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dispatch.thet.net (dispatch.thet.net [172.16.0.18]) by
dispatch.thet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1013E6103A; Sat, 17 Dec 2016
11:49:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dispatch.thet.net (dispatch.thet.net [172.16.0.18]) by
dispatch.thet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA586E61035; Sat, 17 Dec 2016
11:49:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dispatch.thet.net (dispatch.thet.net [172.16.0.18]) by
dispatch.thet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12323E60FF7; Sat, 17 Dec 2016
11:48:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f177.google.com (mail-yw0-f177.google.com
[209.85.161.177]) by dispatch.thet.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F6F3E60FF7 for
<[email protected]>; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 11:47:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-yw0-f177.google.com with SMTP id i145so46776688ywg.2 for
<[email protected]>; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 08:47:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.37.30.86 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 08:47:28 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0140925220=="
X-Thetnet-Mailscanner-Id: A1013E6103A.A0BA7
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
X-Beenthere: [email protected]
X-Beenthere: [email protected]
X-Beenthere: [email protected]
Received-Spf: fail (google.com: domain of [email protected] does not
designate 104.219.98.14 as permitted sender) client-ip=104.219.98.14;
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.thet.net/mailman/options/admin>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.thet.net/mailman/listinfo/admin>,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=thet-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=8F82G0kwQs0BGWAs4rc0JlbGrQ5jSEAp9BGHHsLlJGQ=;
b=z4aCN7tqgI6/fqyUS0996YyJ3h9vBdciKFZDMciilUXU1d1VzpD9MPEw5iFzTvTiBk
JboPNIV4zE41HWJcMRL3FIJ2A9ahgpkAD+p48PIxjqveclm4BM92Ioj3LXqrXg6lLs+Q
SkqLIEl6DQLzWigaixP49UmPqbQjSbfxLvxq32MXFVldcOF7n/5Q1SfFQkErRq8S14x8
U1Keu94MZCSi2xp7bXj4ARdtdOsOOemWCRRSzrAd0nR+uqsW+aOKPHmqYZqHHz3Ct328
XH+wBOs/CUSe7sOrQCM/RlHb2IQg0rTS0t3V3jhZkYaquDF59rgTYsNyo7BEToSeXDfV QuOg==
>
> From: Lindsay Haisley <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] list mail increasingly flagged as spam
> Date: December 19, 2016 at 11:01:11 AM EST
> To: [email protected]
> Reply-To: [email protected]
>
>
> On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 07:52 -0500, Glen Page wrote:
>> I have recently begun to see (and get complaints from some of my
>> users) our list messages being flagged on many users end as spam
>> messages. Wondering if there is anything that i can do on our end to
>> decrease the likelyhood of our messages being flagged as spam. If it
>> would help, I can send some header info from some of our messages.
>
> I'm not a Mailman maintainer, but it might be helpful if you could post
> any information that would help narrow down the problem. Specifically,
> are most or all of the users who have this problem using a particular
> mail provider such as Gmail, or some other service? Have any of these
> users posted any information to you regarding the reason their mail
> service has improperly flagged these list posts?
>
> --
> Lindsay Haisley | "Everything works if you let it"
> FMP Computer Services |
> 512-259-1190 | --- The Roadie
> http://www.fmp.com |
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Mailman-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
> Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
> Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Glen Page
Director of Information Technology
ThetNet - Thetford Academy
802.785.4805.x231
Every time it rains pennies from heaven, I get down on my hands and knees and
try to protect my head because those things really hurt.
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
