On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 12:40 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > So basically, the users that were unsubscribed ignored the fact that > they weren't receiving list mail and ignored 10 messages informing them > their delivery was disabled and telling them how to re-enable it.
OK, so I'm in the clear to resubscribe these folks. > Maybe > the list is better off without them? Actually, we try to be gentle with these folks and keep things as simple as possible. Some of them are pretty non-techie and these messages probably elicit a hormonal technophobia reaction. I'll just resubscribe them. What chaps my dookie is subscribers on AOL and other similar services who don't bother to even _try_ to unsubscribe if they want off a list and just hit "Report Spam" and I get an AOL TOS message from which I have to extract the subscriber address. Not a great problem since I have the subscriber address AES-encrypted into the Resent-message-ID header, but still a PITA. -- Lindsay Haisley | "The first casualty when FMP Computer Services | war comes is truth." 512-259-1190 | http://www.fmp.com | -- Hiram W Johnson ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
