On 10/10/2017 08:33 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > @mark: > > The Hotmail error message does make it sufficiently clear that these > bounces are due to DMARC. I will probably file an RFE to catch these > against Mailman 3. Would you like me to do that for Mailman 2, or is > this "obvously not worth it" in your opinion? (I intend to supply > code "eventually". ;-)
Are you suggesting that we ignore bounces that can be determined to be due to DMARC policy. This is an interesting idea and would help prevent "innocent" list members from being "bounced" off the list, but the cost would be that these innocent members don't receive some posts and this happens "silently" so the list admins may not even be aware that there is a problem. Of course, we could inundate them with notices ;) I'd be interested in what you come up with for MM 3, and then maybe consider a backport. > I should also fix the FAQ to mention the names of the new options, no? Both FAQs could use tweaking or more. <https://wiki.list.org/x/17891458> needs more about current options and the MM 3 section at <https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC> needs a significant update. I suspect one of us will get to it. -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org