On 10/17/2017 04:40 PM, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote: > On 10/17/2017 03:22 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> Agreed, but the above imply NOT RFC 5322 compliant. > > Please elaborate, if you're referring to more than From: vs Sent-By:. > >> In other words, an invalid DKIM signature SHOULD be treated no >> differently from no signature. > > Fair enough.
Why? If this message doesn't match its signature, then it has been altered in transit for sure. If were not signed, like when I post from home (because I can't be arsed to set gpg up on winderz), then there's no telling if it was or wasn't. One of those things is quite a bit not like the other. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
