Mm-handler is definitely a cool idea. But it seems that once Mailman can
update Sendmail's aliases immediately there is no need for mm-handler.
I need to test my understanding. Is setting MTA to 'Postfix' supposed
to cover the 'Sendmail' case with some changes or should there be a
specific MTA file to cover Sendmail?
According to:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2004-June/037518.html
it is just a matter of changing POSTFIX_ALIAS_CMD to something
different. I either missed the article or I didn't understand it the
first time I looked at the docs. This seems like it might be easier to
maintain and setup than the mm-handler. At least it is the way I would
have chosen.
Mark, Thanks for the pointer!
Ciao,
//Z\\
On 11/28/2018 5:27 PM, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote:
On 11/28/2018 02:39 PM, Jim Ziobro wrote:
I now realize that mm-handler would not be necessary if Mailman fully
connected to Sendmail. The Postfix connection looks very close.
Please elaborate on what you mean by "if Mailman fully connected to
Sendmail". Rather, how is Mailman not already connected to Sendmail
via mm-handler?
Or is your goal to remove mm-handler and directly configure Mailman
itself as what Sendmail refers to as a "Mailer"?
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
