On 2/27/20 10:27 AM, Dennis Putnam wrote: > > From: Jane Doe (jane.doe at domain.tld) via Listname > <listn...@example.com>
On 2/27/20 10:27 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: > > Sorry, I meant this: > > From: Jane Doe (jane.doe#domain.tld) via Listname <listn...@example.com> Both of those still have the domain which is also considered problematic We could consider From: Jane Doe (jane.doe at domain dot tld) via Listname <listn...@example.com> for Mailman 3, but that seems unduly kludgy. There won't be any change in Mailman 2.1 which is only waiting for i18n updates for the final 2.1.30 release which will be the last release from the GNU Mailman project. The point is that we (apparently not RedHat's backport, but upstream) already include the sender's display name and we try very hard to ensure that compliant MUAs produce the same result for 'reply', 'reply-all' and 'reply-list' whether or not the From: is munged. I think that should be sufficient. -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
