On 9/17/20 7:36 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: > Here's my POV, if mm2 can (and it appears to me that it > can somewhat easily) be fixed to use py3 then all the installed bases of > mm2 don't have to learn/deal/secure/test/manage/deal with a REST API > and/or Flask, etc.
Or they can just continue to use Mailman 2.1 with Python 2.7, and no one needs to do anything. > What I'm trying to do is > provide a painless (or, at least a less painful) path forward for all > those existing Mailman sites that don't want to deal with all the same > issues that are appearing over on the MM3-users list and in #mailman. Forward to where? -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/ Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/ https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/
